Why Gold Matters

Truth, like gold, is to be obtained not by its growth, but by washing away from it all that is not gold.
— -Leo Tolstoy, author
If you don’t own gold...there is no sensible reason for it except not knowing history or not knowing the economics of it...
— Ray Dalio, Bridgewater
I have no views as to where it will be, but the one thing I can tell you is it won’t do anything between now and then except look at you. Whereas, you know, Coca-Cola will be making money, and I think Wells Fargo will be making a lot of money… and it’s a lot better to have a goose that keeps laying eggs than a goose that just sits there and eats insurance and storage and a few things like that.
— Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway
“In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value.
— Alan Greenspan, former Federal Reserve Chairman

When it comes to gold, perspectives vary and emotions run high. The differing opinions expressed in each of the quotes above hints at an aspect of this unique yellow element. What is gold? Why is it such an apparently controversial topic? What purpose does it have in an asset portfolio? In short, why does gold matter? This missive seeks to answer these questions in plain English. 

Gold is Money

Money is defined as a store of value, a unit of measure, and a medium of exchange. Throughout all of recorded history gold has fulfilled this definition of money. Gold is the treasure of Solomon, the money of kings, the first object of loot in war, and the principle goal of both pirates of the Spanish Main and modern day shipwreck expeditions. Gold is money in every sense of the word...and always has been.  

Of course, there have been, and are today, many other forms of money. Shells, stone disks of various sizes, silver and copper coins, cattle, horses, paper, land, and even electronic 1s and 0s in the modern case of Bitcoin. What we usually think of as money today, namely dollars, euros, francs, pounds, and the like, are considered fiat currencies, meaning that they are assigned their value by governments requiring taxes to be denominated and paid in kind.

There are likewise many means of storing and accumulating wealth that sometimes look very much like money. For example, US government bonds have relatively consistent value and can be exchanged for other items of value. Similarly, one could think of a piece of real estate property, or a share of General Electric stock as something having value, and having the potential to be exchanged for something else of value. Even credit in its purest form, a person's promise to give value in the future, can be thought of similarly to money. Credit can be used to buy a car, and then that same loan can be bought and sold between banks.

But let's not stray too far from our topic. The point is that there are many things that have money-like characteristics, but gold is only money and nothing else. True, gold is also shiny, makes nice jewelry, and has a few industrial uses due to its electrical and thermal characteristics. However, to consider these aspects of gold is to cloud our perspective as investors, because gold derives nearly all of its value due to its "money-ness". So for our purposes we should see gold as simply money. It generates no income, it carries no accompanying liability, it just sits there being gold today, tomorrow, and for the next thousand years...and that is exactly its value.

Inversely Comparable Valuation

Okay, so gold is money, but what makes gold more or less valuable as measured against other assets and forms of money? Answering this question also explains the strong, and often conflicting statements of opinion about gold. Gold's value varies as its desirability relative to other forms of assets varies. Said another way, gold is the denominator of a relative relationship between assets. At the time of this writing, gold is priced at a bit more than $1200 per Troy ounce. Specifically, the dollar price of gold will go up if either gold becomes more relatively attractive or if the dollar becomes less relatively attractive.

As we've discussed, gold's essence doesn't change. It is what it is. Therefore, when the "price" or "value" of gold appears to increase, what is actually occurring is that the relative value of alternative assets is decreasing.  Understanding this, we can see the reason behind the intensity of the various opinions on gold. The price of gold is the definition of a zero-sum game. Gold is either losing value because other assets are gaining more and more attraction and investor attention, or gaining value because other assets are losing their appeal. Since gold is currently, by most estimates, substantially less than 1% of the total value of the worlds assets, it should be no surprise that in the aggregate there are many more investors and market commentators hoping for and "rooting" for the future value of those other assets than for gold. This is especially typically true for many of those in the financial business whose living depends on the increasing value of alternatives to gold.

Warren Buffett's comment on gold is also an important one, and is not as disparaging as it appears on first glance. He isn't disputing that gold IS wealth. He's merely pointing out that is isn't an asset that PRODUCES wealth. As perhaps the greatest selector of wealth producing assets in history, he has both a valid point, and an understandably biased perspective. Financial theory states that it is accepting risk that produces return. While companies that mine gold certainly are both risky and expected to produce investor returns, gold itself is a return-free asset. As Buffett says, it just sits there.

Reserve Currency of Last Resort

In recent decades, gold has drawn the public scorn of central bankers around the world, but less than fifty years ago gold was directly tied to the value of the US dollar. Until the 1930’s, the US Dollar was freely interchangeable with gold at the set price of $20.67 per troy ounce. During the only deflationary environment in the 20th century at the heights of the Great Depression, Franklin D Roosevelt devalued the dollar against gold via the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, increasing the nominal price of gold to $35 per troy ounce. This new price enticed foreign investors to export their gold to the United States and simultaneously devalued the dollar creating inflation. 

While Roosevelt’s actions forbade US private ownership of gold, the dollar’s international convertibility was maintained at the $35 per ounce level until 1971. As inflationary pressures rose and the dollar’s value declined during the 1960’s international dollar holders, led by Charles de Gaulle, increasingly demanded redemption of their dollars in gold. As US gold holdings declined precipitously, in 1971, President Richard Nixon declared that the United States would no longer honor the exchange of dollars into gold at the official rate. While this was intended to be temporary, inflation persisted and the dollar to gold exchange rate was raised first to $38, then to $42.22, before finally being allowed to float as a market traded contract on the New York and Chicago exchanges in 1975. 

Gold’s ongoing importance as an international reserve currency is underlined in recent years with China’s central bank purchases drawing intense media and investor attention (PBOC). China wants its currency, the Yuan, to enjoy the benefits of reserve currency status. A key component of this is the status a reserve currency gains by being unofficially backed by the issuing country’s gold holdings. China currently only officially holds a bit under 2% of its current reserves in gold. Increasing these holdings into the 5-10% range would have substantial effect on the real and perceived strength of its currency as a global reserve currency.

While monetary history and the study of international currency movements can be dry, the importance of gold on the macro level of the global economy and the trade and political relationships between countries cannot be overstated. Gold gives strength to a countries’ currency which lowers borrowing costs, and increases that country’s economic power. Two thirds of the familiar term “cold hard cash” is owed to characteristics of the yellow seventy-ninth element. 

Natural Diversifier

Gold plays a critical role as a diversifying asset in a properly optimized portfolio. The specific stated goal of a diversified portfolio is to reduce risk while acknowledging that such risk reduction is necessarily accomplished by also reducing return to some extent. Where possible, we want to reduce risk by negative correlation rather than by low positive correlation. Simply an asset that tends to move in the inverse to other assets in a portfolio has more "diversification value" than an asset that simply moves independently of other assets in a portfolio. As such gold has few peers due to its very nature.  Its value is both derived and defined by its relative value versus other investment alternatives.

We can also take a broader and less technical perspective on gold in our portfolios is to consider it as insurance on our other assets. Just as buying life insurance is often quite advisable in many circumstances, so is buying golds "portfolio insurance". As investors we look to acquire this unique asset when the risk-return ratio is favorable. While we can legitimately hope to never realize the full value of such insurance, we can certainly appreciate the increased stability of our portfolios during volatile markets.

Critics sometimes point to the volatile and sometimes seemingly random nature of golds price moves as a weakness. Gold’s volatility can be explained best by two facts. The first that it is a relatively small percentage of total financial assets at well under 1%. It doesn’t take a large capital shift to dramatically affect its price. In addition to this, gold is the one asset that responds to both fear and greed. This positive feedback tends to drive exaggerated moves.  Former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke once stated the “Nobody really understands gold prices and I don’t pretend to understand them either”. Of course, his seeming ignorance was followed with the observation that a declining gold price “suggests people have somewhat more confidence and are less concerned about really bad outcomes”. Exactly! And Bernanke’s predecessor, Alan Greenspan recently reiterated his view that gold is profoundly important to reducing currency risk. We agree. Since other assets in a portfolio are denominated in dollars (or euros, or yen), it makes sense to own an asset that directly insures against the denominator’s loss of value.

Summary

What is gold and why does it matter? Gold is money. Always has been, probably always will be. It is often an emotional due to the implications of its essence as an asset. Gold often moves counter to the value of, and faith placed in, other investment options. To say this another way, gold often goes up when “other stuff” goes down. Gold owners and “other stuff” owners aren’t often happy at the same time. Of course, this is exactly gold’s primary value to us from a portfolio standpoint. We seek asset classes with negative correlation since this allows an overall reduction in portfolio risk without proportional reduction in overall expected returns. Gold is simply ultimate currency in unchanging and possessable form. A portfolio anchor in a world of increasing economic correlation, cross-currents, and complexity. 


SVANE CAPITAL, LLC IS A REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISER. INFORMATION PRESENTED IS FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT INTEND TO MAKE AN OFFER OR SOLICITATION FOR THE SALE OR PURCHASE OF ANY SPECIFIC SECURITIES, INVESTMENTS, OR INVESTMENT STRATEGIES. PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT AN INDICATION OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE. INVESTMENTS INVOLVE RISK AND UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ARE NOT GUARANTEED. BE SURE TO FIRST CONSULT WITH A QUALIFIED FINANCIAL ADVISER AND/OR TAX PROFESSIONAL BEFORE IMPLEMENTING ANY STRATEGY DISCUSSED HEREIN.

Salmon Oil

One salmon now costs more than one barrel (42 gal.) of crude oil.

The statistic seems mind-boggling on the surface, and is even more mind-boggling under the surface as we will see, but nevertheless, there it stood as fact on the virtual “pages” of www.bloomberg.com, along with several years of salmon and oil price data.

Both salmon and oil are used primarily for their energy content. Salmon is generally converted to human or animal (e.g. grizzly bear) energy while oil is typically used to power various machines. A typical 10lb salmon contains 10,000 calories. Our representative salmon could sustain average human activity for about 5 days. One barrel of oil contains 1,500,000 calories, or enough energy to sustain human activity for 2 years!

Something to chew on… 

Markets start off 2016 with a bang…and then a rebound

There was no shortage of market excitement in January. Unfortunately, that excitement initially took place in a big way to the downside in nearly every major asset class. Measured from the end of 2015 to the market lows around January 20th, nearly every asset class experienced significant declines with the notable exception of gold. 

The S&P 500 fell 11%, while international developed markets fell 12%. An emerging market index dropped 14%, high yield bonds fell 6%, and a gold mining stock index declined 10%. Large cap notables including Apple and Exxon fell similarly, 12% and 8% respectively. Then it was as if someone had flipped the light switch back on! From the monthly lows the S&P 500 rose 7%, international developed markets increased 8%, emerging market stocks climbed 10% and high yield went up 5%. Exxon finished the monthly almost back to where it started the year and Apple clawed back about half of its losses. The gold mining stock index climbed 15% from the lows while gold itself continued rising all month long finishing with a monthly gain around 5%.

This remarkable action punctuates a period of heightened uncertainty. Among other factors, central bank policy, international economic struggles, turbulence in the energy markets, and political uncertainty all played a role. Market volatility may continue for some time (or it may not, we aren’t making a prediction here), but it certainly serves to underscore one of the primary principles of investing. We don’t want to be forced or pushed to sell into steep market declines. Proper portfolio construction and risk assessment mean that we are prepared ahead of time in order to either do nothing and let the storm pass, or perhaps take advantage of market panic by buying assets cheaper than they would otherwise be. 

Statistically speaking

Bear markets are defined as declines of at least twenty percent from peak to trough. Likewise, bull markets are defined as price gains of at least twenty percent from trough to peak. Why twenty and not some other number? Our guess is the reason probably has more to do with the fact that most of us have ten fingers and ten toes than any other significant cause. For any long term investor both bull and bear markets are inevitable and a perfectly normal component of the market milieu. While many (particularly the media) focus on the scary and sensational news component of bear markets, and some even think it is possible to avoid them altogether, professional investors know that bear markets represent the periods of time when the likelihood and magnitude of future gains are highest. Therefore, they are to be studied with a mindset geared toward to buying assets rather than selling them.

Andrew Sheets and his team at Morgan Stanley crunched the numbers of forty bear markets in the last fifty years spanning multiple equity asset classes. They found that the average bear market has lasted roughly 190 to 270 business days, although the shortest and longest were substantially outside of this range. Bear market declines typically ended with roughly 30% declines measured from peak to trough. 

The current emerging market bear (as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index) is currently 370 days old and at a total decline of roughly 35%. The S&P 500 has not technically entered into a bear market yet. Since May, its decline has registered roughly 15% over 160 days.

Andrew’s team also looked at the historical market behavior in the subsequent months following a decline meeting the official definition of a bear market. Looking at the history of the MSCI All Country World Index, measuring three months forward from the day marking at least a 20% decline showed an average additional loss of about 10%. Again, measured from the bear market demarcation date, “fast-forwarding” in time twelve months showed an average gain of 30%!

It is very important to point out that market history is exactly that, just the measurement of price movements in the past, and as such, it doesn’t provide a crystal ball forecast of the future. However, it has been said that while history may not repeat, it often rhymes. Understanding typical behavior in the relatively recent past can shed some light on probabilities, and typical ranges of outcomes, that can be quite useful. 

Time Is On Our Side

And time goes by so slowly
And time can do so much
— The Righteous Brothers (Unchained Melody)

FV=PV*(1+r)^t is the formula for what Einstein called the Eighth Wonder of the World, namely the power of compound interest. Time is the most important driver of this wealth building equation, but it can also be the most difficult part for real investors to harness because of the fact that we are ourselves bounded by its constraints. As seemingly important information (news headlines or price changes in our portfolios) is constantly arriving, there can be a strong urge to periodically change course, and therefore possibly press reset on the all-important time variable.

We’re fairly certain Tom Petty wasn’t thinking about investing while he sang “The Waiting”, but he could have been. In fact, rather than “seeing a card” every day, as investors, we may only “see a card” that actually matters every few months. Because if this, it is critically important that we have confidence in our strategy can therefore wait patiently, and without undue concern. If we aren’t able to stick with our plan through down periods, we simply can’t expect to achieve our long term investment goals.

The waiting is the hardest part
Every day you see one more card
— Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers (The Waiting)

Research shows that the returns actually achieved by many investors fail to measure up what might have been expected given the options available to them (and the known ex-post-facto returns of those investment options). Perhaps the best known study is done by DALBAR, Inc. and updated each year. Some noteworthy findings from the 2015 summary:


•    The 20-year annualized broad market equity return exceeded the 20-year annualized return earned by the average equity investor by almost a 2:1 margin (9.85% vs 4.66%)


•    In 2014 both the broader stock and bond markets outperformed the average stock and average bond investor by factors exceeding 2:1


•    This under-performance of the average investor occurred in spite of him/her “guessing right” 8 of 12 months (as judged by subsequent months’ performance)


These performance discrepancies are mostly due to asset class selection and the timing of the buys and sells of the asset classes. Many investors inadvertently end up with a start-stop-start-stop approach. Even if this is unintended, and even if the starts and stops only happen on just a very few occasions, the damage done to overall returns can be substantial.

Despite being generally “right” about immediate market direction, investors as a whole under-perform the broad market indexes because being out of the market earns nothing, and also because by the time a move feels right, it is often almost over.  The magnitude of market impact for unexpected events exceeds the magnitude of market impact for expected events by a substantial margin. Many investors fail to account for these surprises (which we know are bound to happen, but for which we don’t know the timing) in their investment plan. 


Given the meager actual performance of intelligent and motivated people, what should we do to place the odds back in our favor? In the simplest possible terms, what matters most is sticking with a reasonable investing strategy for an extended period of time. Three questions:

Question: What is a reasonable investing strategy?
Answer: A reasonable investing strategy holds different types of investments (diversification) and doesn’t try to time the market by repeatedly jumping in and out of investments. A reasonable strategy can also be biased toward more attractive values. 

Question: How can we make sure we stick with the strategy?
Answer: We should our portfolio risk constraints to a level appropriate with our individual situations and personalities. (This is why the risk profile we cover at the beginning of the process is so important, it directly influences the likelihood that we “hang in there” without too much teeth gnashing.) 

Question: How long do we have to wait?
Answer: That is a question that requires a statistical answer. One way is to note that many market cycles occur over 7-10 year periods (or less), so it is likely that within that period of time, our strategy and discipline will be rewarded. A longer answer is that it depends on the stochastic nature of the market process and the degree of certainty we require in our test. For example, how many times would we need to toss a coin before we can be sure we will have 50% heads and 50% tails?

In summary, as investors, we can maximize our probability of achieving good long-term returns by picking a good plan, and then by sticking to the plan, and allowing compound interest to work in our favor. While we can’t be certain about the exact future outcomes, due to the nature of risk, we can be confident about process and the overall probability of a positive outcome.




Aging Bull

In many ways, stock and bond performance in late September and October inversely mirrored the declines of late July and August. Volatility declined and selling pressure abated as stock indices rose and yield spreads declined. Late in the month, a flurry of positive earnings results from some of the technology giants drove the large cap growth sector close to all-time highs. The torrent of news headlines announcing an impending bear market has slowed to a trickle and we’ve noticed increasing numbers of “experts” suggesting that the recent turmoil might have been overdone, and in particular may have simply been a normal correction in a long-term bull market. This is an excellent opportunity to step back and take a broader look at historical market norms.

A popular measure of the United States stock market is the S&P 500.  A bear market in stocks is commonly defined as any decline from a recent peak that exceeds 20%, while a correction is a decline that exceeds 10% but stops short of a bear market, and a pullback is any decline of less than 10%. Since the current bull market began six and a half years ago in March of 2009, this index has experienced several price declines of note as shown in Table 1 below*:

Viewed in this perspective, the recent market decline was simply an average correction in the current long and continuing bull market and in and of itself does not indicate any change in market action from what has typified the post crisis recovery.

S&P500-declines.jpg

Taking an even longer term perspective of all S&P 500 bull markets since 1926 is also an interesting and useful exercise. Table 2 to the left shows show the gains of various bull (>20%) markets over the past 90 years while Table 3 shows the durations in months of these same market moves.

In summary, we can say that the S&P 500 remains in one of the longer bull markets on recent record. Recent market action to the downside since midsummer, doesn’t look out-of-place when compared to other price declines within the current bull market. However, the historical evidence suggests that we are closer to the end of the current bull market than to the beginning.


Divergences

Volatility continued during the month of September with many asset classes experiencing price declines.  We took advantage of a market rebound in US stocks towards the middle of the month to reduce our exposure and add to our cash positions. With a majority of asset classes now lower than they were a year ago, we plan to continue to be patient with our current holdings, and alert for opportunities to add investments at attractive prices using the cash we have accumulated.

The majority of asset classes experienced price declines during the month of September. Global stock markets were down roughly 3-5% and certain commodity related asset classes dropped even more.  Asset class valuation and trend differences have become increasingly pronounced. By way of example, a broad measure of domestic stocks is up almost 50% above the peaks of 2007, while a broad measure of emerging market stocks remains about 30% below its peaks of the same year.  Often a bellwether of commodities, gold has retreated over 40% from highs reached in 2011 and now trades at prices last seen in 2009.  Measured from the same point in 2009, an investment in high yield bonds would have returned about 50% based on today’s prices. Price and valuation changes give us opportunities to potentially enhance our long term returns.

Market declines offer wonderful opportunities to deploy capital for future profitable harvests.  Using a farming analogy, where possible we want to plant during periods of low prices and reap the gains during seasons of elevated prices. Most of us love to buy items on sale when possible, but we often feel differently about buying investments on sale.  The reason is for this is that watching prices decline induces fear and that fear can cloud our rational judgement. This is where valuation models, and taking a disciplined approach to investing can have long term rewards.
As value sensitive investors, we welcome wide differences in asset valuations and relative performance because it can grant us opportunities to buy low and to sell high.  While no one we are aware of has a properly functioning crystal ball when it comes to asset prices, we can and do try to buy a little more and sell a little less during “buying season” for any given asset class.  Our view is that some of the asset classes we follow are definitely closer to “buying season” than “selling season” and our plan is to take advantage of some of these differentials over the next few months while remaining appropriately diversified.